<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gaining SEO Value From Your Affiliates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=seo-value-from-affiliates</link>
	<description>Corporate SEO, Internet Marketing &#38; e-Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robkerry.co.uk/?p=131#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Very nice, Rob!

It&#039;s great to see some more posts from you. I&#039;m going to work out if I can organise the hash ID tracking through e-junkie but I&#039;m not very hopeful.

Sphunn!

Cheers,
Glen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, Rob!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see some more posts from you. I&#8217;m going to work out if I can organise the hash ID tracking through e-junkie but I&#8217;m not very hopeful.</p>
<p>Sphunn!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Glen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kerry</title>
		<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robkerry.co.uk/?p=131#comment-712</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t see affiliate links as paid links - you have little control over them and people place them on their website out of choice. If taking this view - every banner on every website is also a paid link. Certainly no penalties related to them - you can see this from the rankings of companies that use SEO friendly affiliate links. In fact, it&#039;s just giving Google fewer redirects to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t see affiliate links as paid links &#8211; you have little control over them and people place them on their website out of choice. If taking this view &#8211; every banner on every website is also a paid link. Certainly no penalties related to them &#8211; you can see this from the rankings of companies that use SEO friendly affiliate links. In fact, it&#8217;s just giving Google fewer redirects to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kerry</title>
		<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robkerry.co.uk/?p=131#comment-711</guid>
		<description>I personally wouldn&#039;t draw attention to your desire for links - just offer affiliates lots of reasons to keep your links clean e.g. lots of product data, free  content, widgets etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally wouldn&#8217;t draw attention to your desire for links &#8211; just offer affiliates lots of reasons to keep your links clean e.g. lots of product data, free  content, widgets etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni Anicic</title>
		<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni Anicic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robkerry.co.uk/?p=131#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Affiliate links are considered paid links, right? Shouldn&#039;t they carry a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;? Google probably recognizes common affiliate links and disregards their effect on SERPs or even penalizes the use thanks to their paid link policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affiliate links are considered paid links, right? Shouldn&#8217;t they carry a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;? Google probably recognizes common affiliate links and disregards their effect on SERPs or even penalizes the use thanks to their paid link policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelvin newman</title>
		<link>http://robkerry.co.uk/blog/seo-value-from-affiliates.html#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>kelvin newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robkerry.co.uk/?p=131#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Great post as you&#039;d expect Rob, good to see this all pulled together in one post, 

If implementing one of these schemes I spose then there lots of nice follow on tactics you can use. 

E.g. a prize for every new affiliate who adds a link that month etc, make a big deal of increasing the commision on a new section of the site to kick start it&#039;s link growth etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as you&#8217;d expect Rob, good to see this all pulled together in one post, </p>
<p>If implementing one of these schemes I spose then there lots of nice follow on tactics you can use. </p>
<p>E.g. a prize for every new affiliate who adds a link that month etc, make a big deal of increasing the commision on a new section of the site to kick start it&#8217;s link growth etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
